<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">  
  <channel>         
    <title>Authors : Paul Kucharski</title>    
    <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//index.html?id=872</link>
    <description>Index des publications de Authors Paul Kucharski</description>
    <language>fr</language>    
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Speaking Rationally About the Good</title>  
      <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4731-2015-1-03.html</link>
      <description>In this paper, I explain and defend Karol Wojtyła’s claim that “if we wish to speak rationally about good and evil, we have to return to the philosophy of being. If we do not set out from such ‘realist’ presuppositions, we end up in a vacuum.” I begin by outlining Wojtyła’s existential understanding of the good, according to which the good for x is found in those ends that complete the being that is lacking in x, or that enhance its existence in keeping with its nature. (Here Wojtyła is drawing from, and building upon, Thomas Aquinas’s account of goodness and being.) Then I explain how Wojtyła moves from an existential understanding of the good to the thesis that “exemplarism is the very heart of the normative order.” Finally, using representative thinkers from both the Continental and Analytic traditions, I defend Wojtyła’s claim that when we divorce goodness from being we end up in a moral vacuum, in a kind of nihilism where the good signifies nothing other than the rationalized articulation of one’s subjective needs, desires, or wishes. In such a state, the only means for resolving moral disagreements is through the consensus of the majority or the forceful rule of the strongest will.    </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 15:37:01 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 15:37:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4731-2015-1-03.html</guid>
    </item>         </channel>
</rss>