<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">  
  <channel>         
    <title>Authors : Louis Caruana</title>    
    <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//index.html?id=633</link>
    <description>Index des publications de Authors Louis Caruana</description>
    <language>fr</language>    
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Universal Claims</title>  
      <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4601-16-1-spring-2011-10.html</link>
      <description>Claims are universal when they are not dependent on when and where they are made. Mathematics and the natural sciences are the typical disciplines that allow such claims to be made. Is the striving for universal claims in other disciplines justified. Those who attempt to answer this question in the affirmative often argue that it is justified when mathematics and the natural sciences are taken as the model for other disciplines. In this paper I challenge this position and analyze the issue by looking at it from a new angle, a perspective that involves two key concepts: violence and loyalty. The result of this analysis throws light on the broader question concerning what the search for truth might mean in a pluralistic world. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:09:46 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:09:46 +0100</lastBuildDate>      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4601-16-1-spring-2011-10.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introduction</title>  
      <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4583-16-1-spring-2011-01.html</link>
      <description>An introduction to the journal is presented in which the author cites that the issue is dedicated to the works of Jesuit philosophers, discusses Jesuits engagement in philosophy, and provides an overview of articles published within the issue. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:06:19 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:06:19 +0100</lastBuildDate>      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4583-16-1-spring-2011-01.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Science Eliminating Ordinary Talk?</title>  
      <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3907-0401-02.html</link>
      <description>Discussions dealing with natural science, philosophy and common sense are bound to draw on long-standing debates dealing with realism, methodology of science, philosophy of mind, metaphysics, epistemology, theories of meaning, and other topics. Instead of presenting a broad overview of these main trends, which will necessarily be superficial, I will do a kind of case study. The aim is to present just one particular debate which is of relevance to current research. The presentation is meant to give a taste of how these various long-standing debates are brought to bear on a specific issue. In this way, the very practice of engaging in a particular area of philosophy of science will serve as a platform from where the major areas can be seen in actual operation. The paper has four sections: the nature of ordinary talk; the ontological implications of this; the recently proposed account of the mental; an evaluation. </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 16:01:36 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 16:01:36 +0100</lastBuildDate>      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3907-0401-02.html</guid>
    </item>         </channel>
</rss>