https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4625-17-1-spring-2012-03.html Hume's chapter 'of miracles' has been widely discussed and one issue is that Hume seems to beg the question. Hume has a strong but implicit naturalist bias when he argues against the existence of a reliable testimony of miracle. In this article, I explain that Hume begs the question despite what he says on the possibility of an occurrence of a miracle. The main point is that he never describes a violation of laws of nature that could not be explained by scientific theories Issues 17/1 - Spring 2012 Articles fr Tue, 05 Jan 2021 11:01:51 +0100 Tue, 05 Jan 2021 11:01:51 +0100 https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4625-17-1-spring-2012-03.html 0