<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">  
  <channel>         
    <title>Authors : Anna Zhyrkova</title>    
    <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//index.html?id=432</link>
    <description>Index des publications de Authors Anna Zhyrkova</description>
    <language>fr</language>    
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Matyáš Havrda. The So-Called Eighth Stromateus by Clement of Alexandria</title>  
      <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4796-2201-06.html</link>
      <description>This article reviews the book The So-Called Eighth Stromateus by Clement of Alexandria: Early Christian Reception of Greek Scientific Methodology, by Matyáš Havrda. </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 16:10:55 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 16:11:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4796-2201-06.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Reconstruction of John the Grammarian’s Account of Substance in Terms of Enhypostaton</title>  
      <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4790-2201-03.html</link>
      <description>The concept of enhypostaton was introduced into theological discourse during the sixth-century Christological debates, and aimed to elucidate the orthodox doctrine of the unity of two natures in the singular hypostasis of Christ. In spite of the fact that the conceptual content of the term is recognized by contemporary scholarship as pertaining to the core of Christology, the notion of enhypostaton is often described as obscure and not clearly defined. The coining of the term is often ascribed to Leontius of Byzantium, whereas in fact he only followed and developed solutions already introduced into Christological discourse by John the Grammarian. The article aims to clarify the notion by offering a philosophical account of the meaning and theoretical origins of “enhypostaton,” as introduced by John the Grammarian in the context of his discussion of substance as en-hypostatical being. Enhypostaton emerges as the proper way of describing the ontological complements of a particular entity. This seems to be a significant development in the philosophical explanation of substance. </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 16:10:25 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 16:10:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4790-2201-03.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>George E. Karamanolis. The Philosophy of Early Christianity</title>  
      <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4758-20-2-fall-2015-09.html</link>
      <description>This article reviews the book The Philosophy of Early Christianity, by George E. Karamanolis. </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 15:49:27 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 15:49:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4758-20-2-fall-2015-09.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Marcus Plested. Orthodox Readings of Aquinas</title>  
      <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4657-17-2-fall-2012-08.html</link>
      <description>The article reviews the book Orthodox Readings of Aquinas, by Marcus Plested. </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 11:34:40 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 11:34:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4657-17-2-fall-2012-08.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Philosophical Originality of a Theologian</title>  
      <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4651-17-2-fall-2012-05.html</link>
      <description>In the present paper I would like to explore the possible reasons behind low evaluation of philosophical potential of Byzantine theological thought, which in contemporary studies frequently is seen as lacking philosophical depth and originality. The ultimate question, however, is whether theology may contain original and valuable philosophy. In order to scrutinize those issues, I propose an analysis of an important case of John of Damascus’ heritage, which, in my opinion, provides actual answers to those questions. </description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 11:27:35 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 11:27:35 +0100</lastBuildDate>      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4651-17-2-fall-2012-05.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Leontius of Byzantium and the Concept of Enhypostaton</title>  
      <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3301-leontius-of-byzantium-and-the-concept-of-enhypostaton.html</link>
      <description>The concept of “enhypostaton” was introduced into theological discourse during the sixth-century Christological debates with the aim of justifying the unitary subjectivity of Christ by reclassifying Christ’s human nature as ontically non-independent. The coinage of the term is commonly ascribed to Leontius of Byzantium. Its conceptual content has been recognized by contemporary scholarship as relevant to the core issues of Christology, as well as possessing significance for such philosophical questions as individuation and the nature of individual entityhood. Even so, despite its role in the formation of classical Christological thought, the notion of “enhypostaton” is often regarded as obscure and not clearly defined. This paper aims to shed some light on the meaning of Leontius’ conception of it, in respect of its specifically philosophical import. </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 19:46:24 +0200</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:36:46 +0200</lastBuildDate>      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3301-leontius-of-byzantium-and-the-concept-of-enhypostaton.html</guid>
    </item>         </channel>
</rss>