<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">  
  <channel>             
    <title>Ewolucja katolickiej nauki społecznej, ale jaka?</title>    
    <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4173-09-2004-14.html</link>    
    <description>The author of the article argues against some of Stanisław Pyszka's views presented in the article Ewolucja katolickiej nauki społecznej [Evolution of the Catholic social teaching], published in: „Forum Philosophicum&quot;, 8: 2003. T. Ślipko reproaches S. Pyszka for considering the views on social problems expressed in the encyclical letter „Kerum novarum&quot; „dogmatic&quot;, as influenced in part by the Thomistic philosophy. Pyszka opposes them to a pastoral perspective of the encyclical letters written by Pope John XXIII, Paul VI and John Paul II. Ślipko states that Catholic social teaching develops, taking into consideration historical circumstances in which human social groups are placed, but the moral principles are unchanged.  </description>
    <category domain="https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//87-issues.html">Issues</category>
    <category domain="https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//2615-09-2004.html">9 - 2004</category>
    <category domain="https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//2617-articles.html">Articles</category>    
    <language>fr</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:33:55 +0100</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:33:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>      
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4173-09-2004-14.html</guid>    
    <ttl>0</ttl>             </channel>
</rss>