https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3771-0101-06.html The problem of change has been solved in the philosophical systems threefold: in the radical statism, in the radical variabilism and in the moderate systems. Statism follows the rationalistic theory of knowing, variabilism - the empiricistic one. The systems combining both, rationalism and empiricism try to reconcile statism and variabilism in diferent ways. E.g. Aristotle solved the problem within his theory of potency and act. In his opinion the arts and species are stable, the individuals are variable. Stagirite has construed a complete theory of change. Unfortunately, his theory laboured under a misconception because of including the local movement among the changes. That was a reason why i n the system of Aristotle there appeared many antinomies. Specifically: While all the changes tend to a limit, the local movement has no limit. This fact is peculiarly evident i n the „most perfect" form of movement, the circular. While the limit of change is more perfect than its beginning, no place is more perfect than the other place occupied by a moving thing. Changes occur between the contraries, the places are not contrary. Issues 1 – 1996 Articles fr Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:53:27 +0100 Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:29:50 +0100 https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3771-0101-06.html 0 https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3771-0101-06.html Index des publications de Authors Jan Regner fr 0 https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4045-0701-10.html As the title of my article can indicate, the primary aim of this „brief introduction" is to present the concept of intentionality of one of the world's leading philosophers - John R. Searle. Searle is known for his severe criticism of the dominant traditions in the study of mind, both materialist and dualist, and we may also recall his familiar argument called „the Chinese Room" against theories of „artificial intelligence". The concept of intentionality was founded when philosophers attempted to describe and solve the philosophical problem of specific „quasi-relations" between consciousness and objects and the direction of our mind or language to the real world. I am referring to situations in which we say for instance: „A thinks about p", "B maintains that g", „X asks question if y" and so on. Thu, 10 Dec 2020 12:40:36 +0100 Thu, 10 Dec 2020 12:40:36 +0100 https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//4045-0701-10.html https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3739-articles.html Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:36:08 +0100 Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:36:08 +0100 https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3739-articles.html https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3738-0101.html Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:31:50 +0100 Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:58:08 +0100 https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3738-0101.html https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//87-issues.html Papers in the issue: Jan Zbigniew Marczuk, “Dennett’s Account of Mind versus Kim’s Supervenience Argument”; Jarosław Jagiełło, “Logos und Glaube im ‘secular age’: Zur Religionsphilosophischen Aktualität des Ebner’schen Denkens”; Mark Manolopoulos, “Today’s Truly Philosophical Philosopher of Religion”; Kaziemierz Rynkiewicz, “Der Glückliche Weg zum Erfolg Eines Tugendhaften”; Rob Lovering, “Does Ordinary Morality Imply Atheism? A Reply to Maitzen”; Eric Baldwin, “On Buddhist and Taoist Morality”; Maria Kłańska, “Spinoza und Seine Philosophie im Schaffen der Deutschsprachigen Dichterin Rose Ausländer.” Sun, 26 Jul 2015 16:56:53 +0200 Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:02:11 +0100 https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//87-issues.html