<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">  
  <channel>             
    <title>How Problematic is an Unpopulated Hell?</title>    
    <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3673-2501-07.html</link>    
    <description>The Problem of Suffering (PoS) claims that there is tension between the existence of a perfect God and suffering. The Problem of Hell (PoH) is a version of PoS claiming that a perfect God would lack morally sufficient reasons to allow individuals to be damned to Hell eternally. A few traditional solutions have been developed to PoH, but each of them is problematic. As such, if there is a solution to PoH that is resilient to these problems, then it deserves our attention. In this paper, I develop such a solution. I call this the Unpopulated Hell View (UHV), which claims that Hell exists as a place where eternal damnation could take place, although it never does. First, I explain how UHV solves PoH. Next, I develop four objections against UHV and defend UHV against them. I argue that although some of these objections do more damage to UHV than others, UHV has satisfying responses to all of them. Ultimately I conclude that UHV merits consideration as a novel solution to PoH because it is less problematic than the traditional ones.   </description>
    <category domain="https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//87-issues.html">Issues</category>
    <category domain="https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3661-2501.html">25/1 – Spring 2020</category>
    <category domain="https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3665-articles.html">Articles</category>    
    <language>fr</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:27:52 +0200</lastBuildDate>      
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3673-2501-07.html</guid>    
    <ttl>0</ttl>             </channel>
</rss>