<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">  
  <channel>                
    <title>intelligence</title>    
    <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//index.html?id=3573</link>
    <description>Index de intelligence</description>
    <language>fr</language>    
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Intelligence, Artificial and Otherwise</title>  
      <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3567-2402-11.html</link>
      <description>The idea of artificial intelligence implies the existence of a form of intelligence that is “natural,” or at least not artificial. The problem is that intelligence, whether “natural” or “artificial,” is not well defined: it is hard to say what, exactly, is or constitutes intelligence. This difficulty makes it impossible to measure human intelligence against artificial intelligence on a unique scale. It does not, however, prevent us from comparing them; rather, it changes the sense and meaning of such comparisons. Comparing artificial intelligence with human intelligence could allow us to understand both forms better. This paper thus aims to compare and distinguish these two forms of intelligence, focusing on three issues: forms of embodiment, autonomy and judgment. Doing so, I argue, should enable us to have a better view of the promises and limitations of present-day artificial intelligence, along with its benefits and dangers and the place we should make for it in our culture and society. </description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:43:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 16:36:28 +0100</lastBuildDate>      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3567-2402-11.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Artificial Intelligence versus Agape Love</title>  
      <link>https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3590-2402-12.html</link>
      <description>As Artificial Intelligence researchers attempt to emulate human intelligence and transhumanists work toward superintelligence, philosophers and theologians confront a dilemma: we must either, on the one horn, (1) abandon the view that the defining feature of humanity is rationality and propose an account of spirituality that dissociates it from reason; or, on the other horn, (2) find a way to invalidate the growing faith in a posthuman future shaped by the enhancements of Intelligence Amplification (IA) or the progress of Artificial Intelligence (AI). I grasp both horns of the dilemma and offer three recommendations. First, it is love understood as agape, not rational intelligence, which tells us how to live a godly life. Love tells us how to be truly human. Second, the transhumanist vision of a posthuman superintelligence is not only unrealistic, it portends the kind of tragedy we expect from a false messiah. Third, if as a byproduct of AI and IA research combined with H+ zeal the wellbeing of the human species and our planet is enhanced, we should be grateful. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 11:53:18 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 11:56:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://fp.waik.stronazen.pl:443//3590-2402-12.html</guid>
    </item>  </channel>
</rss>